| From foo@baz Sun Jun 17 12:07:33 CEST 2018 |
| From: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn> |
| Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 08:37:18 -0600 |
| Subject: blkcg: don't hold blkcg lock when deactivating policy |
| |
| From: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn> |
| |
| [ Upstream commit 946b81da114b8ba5c74bb01e57c0c6eca2bdc801 ] |
| |
| As described in the comment of blkcg_activate_policy(), |
| *Update of each blkg is protected by both queue and blkcg locks so |
| that holding either lock and testing blkcg_policy_enabled() is |
| always enough for dereferencing policy data.* |
| with queue lock held, there is no need to hold blkcg lock in |
| blkcg_deactivate_policy(). Similar case is in |
| blkcg_activate_policy(), which has removed holding of blkcg lock in |
| commit 4c55f4f9ad3001ac1fefdd8d8ca7641d18558e23. |
| |
| Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn> |
| Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> |
| CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
| Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
| Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com> |
| Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
| --- |
| block/blk-cgroup.c | 5 ----- |
| 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) |
| |
| --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c |
| +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c |
| @@ -1367,17 +1367,12 @@ void blkcg_deactivate_policy(struct requ |
| __clear_bit(pol->plid, q->blkcg_pols); |
| |
| list_for_each_entry(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node) { |
| - /* grab blkcg lock too while removing @pd from @blkg */ |
| - spin_lock(&blkg->blkcg->lock); |
| - |
| if (blkg->pd[pol->plid]) { |
| if (pol->pd_offline_fn) |
| pol->pd_offline_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]); |
| pol->pd_free_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]); |
| blkg->pd[pol->plid] = NULL; |
| } |
| - |
| - spin_unlock(&blkg->blkcg->lock); |
| } |
| |
| spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock); |