blob: 26a97614fe80317ca39f525dfe8c1aa418904b26 [file] [log] [blame]
From 2d4594acbf6d8f75a27f3578476b6a27d8b13ebb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:22:47 -0500
Subject: fix the regression from "direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof"
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
commit 2d4594acbf6d8f75a27f3578476b6a27d8b13ebb upstream.
Sure, it's better to bail out of past-the-eof read and return 0 than return
a bogus negative value on such. Only we'd better make sure we are bailing out
with 0 and not -ENOMEM...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/direct-io.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1167,6 +1167,7 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb
if (dio->flags & DIO_LOCKING)
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
kmem_cache_free(dio_cache, dio);
+ retval = 0;
goto out;
}