blob: 9cdbf6a23c649d31ee9764ce9cb27e4f70a04ebe [file] [log] [blame]
From a84b69cb6e0a41e86bc593904faa6def3b957343 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:04:19 -0400
Subject: 9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
commit a84b69cb6e0a41e86bc593904faa6def3b957343 upstream.
If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must*
issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or
we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives
and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused
the same tag.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/9p/client.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -828,7 +828,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc
if (err < 0) {
if (err == -EIO)
c->status = Disconnected;
- goto reterr;
+ if (err != -ERESTARTSYS)
+ goto reterr;
}
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) {
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);