| From bippy-5f407fcff5a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 |
| From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
| To: <linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org> |
| Reply-to: <cve@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> |
| Subject: CVE-2024-49869: btrfs: send: fix buffer overflow detection when copying path to cache entry |
| |
| Description |
| =========== |
| |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: |
| |
| btrfs: send: fix buffer overflow detection when copying path to cache entry |
| |
| Starting with commit c0247d289e73 ("btrfs: send: annotate struct |
| name_cache_entry with __counted_by()") we annotated the variable length |
| array "name" from the name_cache_entry structure with __counted_by() to |
| improve overflow detection. However that alone was not correct, because |
| the length of that array does not match the "name_len" field - it matches |
| that plus 1 to include the NUL string terminator, so that makes a |
| fortified kernel think there's an overflow and report a splat like this: |
| |
| strcpy: detected buffer overflow: 20 byte write of buffer size 19 |
| WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 3310 at __fortify_report+0x45/0x50 |
| CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 3310 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-prnet #1 |
| Hardware name: CompuLab Ltd. sbc-ihsw/Intense-PC2 (IPC2), BIOS IPC2_3.330.7 X64 03/15/2018 |
| RIP: 0010:__fortify_report+0x45/0x50 |
| Code: 48 8b 34 (...) |
| RSP: 0018:ffff97ebc0d6f650 EFLAGS: 00010246 |
| RAX: 7749924ef60fa600 RBX: ffff8bf5446a521a RCX: 0000000000000027 |
| RDX: 00000000ffffdfff RSI: ffff97ebc0d6f548 RDI: ffff8bf84e7a1cc8 |
| RBP: ffff8bf548574080 R08: ffffffffa8c40e10 R09: 0000000000005ffd |
| R10: 0000000000000004 R11: ffffffffa8c70e10 R12: ffff8bf551eef400 |
| R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000013 R15: 00000000000003a8 |
| FS: 00007fae144de8c0(0000) GS:ffff8bf84e780000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 |
| CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 |
| CR2: 00007fae14691690 CR3: 00000001027a2003 CR4: 00000000001706f0 |
| Call Trace: |
| <TASK> |
| ? __warn+0x12a/0x1d0 |
| ? __fortify_report+0x45/0x50 |
| ? report_bug+0x154/0x1c0 |
| ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70 |
| ? exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x50 |
| ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 |
| ? __fortify_report+0x45/0x50 |
| __fortify_panic+0x9/0x10 |
| __get_cur_name_and_parent+0x3bc/0x3c0 |
| get_cur_path+0x207/0x3b0 |
| send_extent_data+0x709/0x10d0 |
| ? find_parent_nodes+0x22df/0x25d0 |
| ? mas_nomem+0x13/0x90 |
| ? mtree_insert_range+0xa5/0x110 |
| ? btrfs_lru_cache_store+0x5f/0x1e0 |
| ? iterate_extent_inodes+0x52d/0x5a0 |
| process_extent+0xa96/0x11a0 |
| ? __pfx_lookup_backref_cache+0x10/0x10 |
| ? __pfx_store_backref_cache+0x10/0x10 |
| ? __pfx_iterate_backrefs+0x10/0x10 |
| ? __pfx_check_extent_item+0x10/0x10 |
| changed_cb+0x6fa/0x930 |
| ? tree_advance+0x362/0x390 |
| ? memcmp_extent_buffer+0xd7/0x160 |
| send_subvol+0xf0a/0x1520 |
| btrfs_ioctl_send+0x106b/0x11d0 |
| ? __pfx___clone_root_cmp_sort+0x10/0x10 |
| _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1ac/0x240 |
| btrfs_ioctl+0x75b/0x850 |
| __se_sys_ioctl+0xca/0x150 |
| do_syscall_64+0x85/0x160 |
| ? __count_memcg_events+0x69/0x100 |
| ? handle_mm_fault+0x1327/0x15c0 |
| ? __se_sys_rt_sigprocmask+0xf1/0x180 |
| ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x75/0xa0 |
| ? do_syscall_64+0x91/0x160 |
| ? do_user_addr_fault+0x21d/0x630 |
| entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e |
| RIP: 0033:0x7fae145eeb4f |
| Code: 00 48 89 (...) |
| RSP: 002b:00007ffdf1cb09b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 |
| RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fae145eeb4f |
| RDX: 00007ffdf1cb0ad0 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000004 |
| RBP: 00000000000078fe R08: 00007fae144006c0 R09: 00007ffdf1cb0927 |
| R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffdf1cb1ce8 |
| R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 000055c499fab2e0 R15: 0000000000000004 |
| </TASK> |
| |
| Fix this by not storing the NUL string terminator since we don't actually |
| need it for name cache entries, this way "name_len" corresponds to the |
| actual size of the "name" array. This requires marking the "name" array |
| field with __nonstring and using memcpy() instead of strcpy() as |
| recommended by the guidelines at: |
| |
| https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90 |
| |
| The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-49869 to this issue. |
| |
| |
| Affected and fixed versions |
| =========================== |
| |
| Issue introduced in 6.11 with commit c0247d289e73e18f6ddb0895de30c09770fbed95 and fixed in 6.11.3 with commit 843738ede6cb8b959fb22591fcbabe8b456d7216 |
| Issue introduced in 6.11 with commit c0247d289e73e18f6ddb0895de30c09770fbed95 and fixed in 6.12 with commit 96c6ca71572a3556ed0c37237305657ff47174b7 |
| |
| Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported |
| kernel versions by the kernel community. |
| |
| Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to |
| older supported kernel versions. The official CVE entry at |
| https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2024-49869 |
| will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most |
| up to date information about this issue. |
| |
| |
| Affected files |
| ============== |
| |
| The file(s) affected by this issue are: |
| fs/btrfs/send.c |
| |
| |
| Mitigation |
| ========== |
| |
| The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest |
| stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes. Individual |
| changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel |
| release. Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or |
| supported by the Linux kernel community at all. If however, updating to |
| the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this |
| issue can be found at these commits: |
| https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/843738ede6cb8b959fb22591fcbabe8b456d7216 |
| https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96c6ca71572a3556ed0c37237305657ff47174b7 |